About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/5acbe69012c3b8835703bfff8a598e580eb86364f6fef0c68f5e2a80     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • Did only House Democrats vote against a spending bill on December 19, 2024, that would have kept the government open until March 2025? No, that's not true: While 197 Democrats voted no, so did 38 Republicans. The bill required a two-thirds supermajority in the House, which meant Republicans needed at least some Democratic Party support. The claim appeared in a post on X (archived here) on December 19, 2024 which began: πŸš¨πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ DEMS REJECT TRIMMED SPENDING BILL AFTER GOP KILLED THEIR VERSION After Trump and Elon rallied opposition to the original 1,547-page package, Republicans offered a streamlined 116-page alternative--cutting congressional pay raises and stadium projects. Here is what the post looked like at the time of writing: (Source: X screenshot, with blue lines added to mark border, taken on Fri Dec 20 16:18:42 2024 UTC) On December 19, 2024, the House of Representatives voted down HR 10515, a spending bill (archived here) that would have kept the government running through March 14, 2025 (page 3). The vote failed 174-235 (archived here). Two Democrats voted in favor of the bill; 197 voted no. One voted "present." Republicans were not unanimous in their support: 172 voted yes, 38 voted no. One voted "present." Here is a screenshot from the website of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives showing the vote breakdown for HR 10515: (Source: Clerk of US House website screenshot taken on Fri Dec 20 16:46:36 2024 UTC) Because the House suspended its rules in order to fast-track the bill, approval required a two-thirds majority (page 3, archived here). The 116-page HR 10515 is a replacement for a 1,547-page spending bill (archived here) agreed to by Democrats (archived here). As of December 20, 2024, that original, much longer bill had not been presented for a vote. Additional Lead Stories fact checks on claims involving spending bills are here; on claims involving Congress can be found here.
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • English
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 11 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software