About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/fbb43ef7aead3f1af4cf1f0285166f730bb6936042ffcf8070b6ccb9     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • FACT CHECK: Did The Supreme Court Declare Vaccine And Testing Mandates Illegal? A post shared on Facebook claims the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) declared COVID-19 vaccine and testing mandates illegal. Verdict: False While the Supreme Court recently blocked the implementation of a federal vaccine rule, the court did not go so far as to block all vaccine and testing mandates, according to legal experts. Fact Check: On Jan. 13, the Supreme Court blocked the implementation of a federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) rule that would have required businesses with 100 or more employees to mandate COVID-19 testing or vaccine requirements, according to The New York Times. Soon after, social media users began claiming the court ruled all “vaccine and testing mandates” illegal. This is a misinterpretation of the decision. There is nothing in the text of the decision to suggest that the court found all vaccine and testing mandates illegal. In fact, the same day the court blocked the OSHA rule, it upheld enforcement of a similar vaccine mandate from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that applies to workers in healthcare facilities that receive federal funding, according to The New York Times. Mark Hall, a professor of law at Wake Forest Law, refuted the viral claim in an email to Check Your Fact. “[The court] said only that OSHA can’t impose mandates on virtually all larger employers,” said Hall. “Left untouched are state or local mandates, federal mandates done under laws other than OSHA, such as under Medicare/Medicaid law, and federal mandates that are more focused on higher risk workplaces or other settings.” University of Virginia law professor Margaret Riley agreed with this, telling Check Your Fact in a Jan. 14 email that “Technically, SCOTUS did not strike down any mandates.” (RELATED: Did The Supreme Court ‘Cancel’ Universal Vaccination?) “Yesterday’s decisions were whether to stay two federal mandates, based on petitioners’ likelihood of success on the merits,” she said.” Less well-publicized, but very important, the Court permitted (by refusing to enforce a stay) a vaccine mandate on people employed at health care facilities that receive federal funding through Medicare and Medicaid. Moreover, the SCOTUS decision has no impact on state mandates or any mandates that employers may choose themselves to impose.”
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • English
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 11 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software