About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/161a366cfc76aea561454a55dbbb95775bb7043c203fe5415b71eaf2     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • Fact Check: Viral posts claiming Tipu Sultan as a jihadi are misleading A viral post on X falsely claims that the former Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee declared Tipu Sultan was a jihadi who fought the British to save his own kingdom. Claim :Tipu Sultan was a jihadi, who fought the British to save his kingdom, and was not a freedom fighter Fact :The controversial remark is falsely attributed to former Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee Tipu Sultan was a jihadi, who fought the British to save his kingdom and was not a freedom fighterExternal Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said that Mysore ruler Tipu Sultan was a complex figure, however, contemporary history writings have largely focused on his resistance to British colonial control over India. At the same time, they have underplayed certain aspects of his reign such as stitching foreign alliances and faith-based outreach to rulers in Turkey, Afghanistan, and Persia. Even as the discussion among the political circles continues over the celebration of his birth anniversary, a social media post on X claims that, the Karnataka High Court reportedly said that “Tipu Sultan was Jihadi” and he fought the British colonial rulers to save his own kingdom. He should not be called a freedom fighter as “he massacred thousands of Hindus.” Fact Check: During the investigation, the Telugupost fact check team found the claim that the Karnataka High Court made this observation about the Mysore ruler to be misleading. As we began to debunk the claim by using a customized query in Google Search, we came across a tweet by Sunanda Roy, who clarified that Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee of Karnataka High Court did not call Tipu Sultan “Jihadi” and advised the social media users against attributing the claim to the honourable judge. She also noted that the high court made this observation in 2016 and it is not recent. Here’s the copy of court judgement on November 3, 2016. Following the observation, Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee had to face backlash from Advocates’ Association Bangalore which accused him of making unwarranted remarks not in keeping with the dignity and decorum of court proceedings on a PIL against Tipu Sultan Jayanthi. We did not find a single source in the public domain which indicated that the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee made the ‘jihadi’ remark against Tipu Sultan, the 18th-century ruler of Mysore, who died fighting the Britishers. Hence, the claim made in the viral post is misleading.
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • Telugu
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 2 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software