| schema:text
| - What was claimed
Membership of the single market has led to wage suppression over the last 12 years.
Our verdict
We haven’t seen evidence to prove that membership of the single market suppressed wages in the last 12 years.
Membership of the single market has led to wage suppression over the last 12 years.
We haven’t seen evidence to prove that membership of the single market suppressed wages in the last 12 years.
"The single market is not the jewel in the British Crown, it's actually been a really bad deal that has led to wage suppression over the last 12 years."
Richard Tice, BBC Today, 9 January 2017
We haven’t seen enough evidence to say that membership of the single market has definitely suppressed wages.
Leave means Leave, a campaigning organisation which Mr Tice co-chairs, told us that he was specifically referring to the impact of low skilled immigrants from the rest of the EU after 2004, when ten additional countries joined the block.
That’s a narrower claim than the one he made on the programme, and it doesn’t seem to be substantiated by much evidence. We haven’t seen research that shows immigration from the EU had a major impact on UK wages in the past twelve years, although it may have had a small impact on the wages of some low and semi-skilled workers.
In any case, there’s more to single market membership than the free movement of people; the other three ‘freedoms’ are free movement of goods, services and capital.
If these other freedoms have increased the size of the UK economy as most (though not all) economists think, and led to cheaper prices for consumers, then the real value of UK wages may have been boosted by membership of the single market.
These are all areas of debate, not facts. There aren’t simple answers for what effect the single market has had on UK wages.
Honesty in public debate matters
You can help us take action – and get our regular free email
We've written about this before in our briefing on immigration, jobs and wages.
If Mr Tice meant to refer only to low-skilled workers, as Leave means Leave have told us, then we haven’t seen research that demonstrates a major link between immigration from the EU and lower wages for low-paid work.
Leave means Leave pointed us to a paper from the Bank of England, which compared data from a four three-year periods between 1992-94, 1998-2000, 2004-2006 and 2012-2014 (rather than the last 12 years).
The report did find that an increase in the proportion of foreign-born workers in a region was associated with lower average wages for some types of job, most significantly for low and semi-skilled work.
But although the report was confident the link existed, it also said it was ‘small’, and it made no significant difference whether the immigrants had come from inside or outside of the EU.
Its findings implied that for a low-skilled or semi-skilled occupation paid £8 per hour, EU and non-EU immigration had suppressed wages by between one and two pence per hour each year between 2004-2006 and 2012-2014.
That’s not nothing, but it’s an effect that might easily have been outweighed by other effects of being in the single market.
Update 26 January 2017
We updated this piece to include a link to our briefing on immigration, jobs and wages.
Full Fact fights for good, reliable information in the media, online, and in politics.
|
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)