About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/2ca0c8f29e5f2db053c9e57553b6a12c0617a65de6bc7a8f45abbbea     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • On Nov. 10, 2021, the Twitter account @ianmSC tweeted that "Vermont now has one of the highest infection rates in the US and cases are up 16,700% in the past 4 months." The tweet also said that "92% of adults & 91.2% of everyone 12+ [are at] least partially vaccinated" in the state. The same tweet was also spotted spreading in the wild as a screenshot on Facebook. The Twitter account's many tweets about COVID-19 appeared to largely receive engagements from people who leaned toward anti-science, anti-vaccine, and anti-mask rhetoric. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), vaccines and masks are both effective in the fight against the deadly disease. This tweet contained several figures that we researched. Population and Vaccination Rate According to the Vermont Department of Health, the official population number used for the state on its COVID-19 Vaccine Dashboard is 594,946 people. On Nov. 10, VTDigger, an independent online news website for Vermont, published that "roughly 91% of Vermonters 12 and older" had started the vaccination process. In other words, the first part of the tweet contained accurate numbers that were used to build up to a misleading conclusion. Infection Rate According to the tweet, as of early November, Vermont had "one of the highest infection rates in the U.S." This was true, but again, it was also used in the effort to later show an incorrect and misleading number for the rise in the state's infection rate. On Nov. 11, The New York Times published that Vermont had one of the highest COVID-19 case counts per capita in the country, with 50 in every 100,000 of its citizens being reported as infected in the previous seven days. 'Cases Are Up 16,700%' In the tweet, it said that "cases are up 16,700% in the past 4 months" in the state of Vermont. This was false. According to the bottom of the chart in the tweet, it was sourced from The New York Times. It also noted that the black line was meant to show seven-day averages for case numbers in the state. We compared the chart in the tweet to the chart on the Times' website that was available on Nov. 11. It appeared that the chart in the tweet showed numbers that ended around Nov. 9. According to the Times, the seven-day average for daily cases in Vermont was 315 as of Nov. 9, not around 500 as shown in the tiny numbers on the left side of the chart in the tweet. Also, the tweet claimed that the seven-day average jumped 16,700% in four months. Four months earlier, on July 9, the Times' data showed that the seven-day average was five cases in the state. This represented a rise over those months of 6,200%, not 16,700%. It's unclear how the larger percentage was reached. Perhaps more important is the fact that the tweet's text included a percentage instead of the actual number of cases. This appeared to be an attempt to mislead. The figure 16,700% is far more dramatic than reporting a rise in the seven-day average case count, over the course of four months, from five cases to 315. Vaccine Passports and Testing The final part of the tweet read: "Hard to imagine a less scientifically justifiable policy than vaccine passports to keep others 'safe.'" However, this missed the mark. Since the time that COVID-19 vaccines became available, the vast majority of cases, hospitalizations, and deaths have been in unvaccinated patients, according to data made available by the CDC. The latest data from the Vermont Department of Health showed that the vast majority of recent cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, have been in unvaccinated individuals. As of Nov. 5, the state had reported that a "small portion" of 1.3% of its fully vaccinated residents had experienced breakthrough cases. From the start, the CDC stated that it expected breakthrough cases to happen. On Nov. 5, Burlington, Vermont-based TV station WCAX-TV reported that "part of the reason for the higher case counts is more people are getting tested." This might bring to mind the genuine quote from former U.S. President Donald Trump. In June 2020, he said: "If we stop testing right now, we'd have very few cases." However, as the CDC previously published, testing is important because it "helps to identify unknown cases so that measures can be taken to prevent further transmission." An Unvaccinated Crisis in Vermont WCAX also reported that unvaccinated patients dominated the state's hospitalizations: Data shows up to 80% of Vermont’s hospitalizations are among the 53,000 eligible unvaccinated Vermonters. “We’ve seen the unvaccinated positives really increase, whereas the vaccinated has really stayed steady,” said AHS Secretary Mike Smith. Part of the reason for the higher case counts is more people are getting tested. This week saw near-record levels of tests conducted. Vermont is leading the nation in tests per capita, surpassing the second-highest state by 20%. But Governor Phil Scott says if cases stay this high, we could see hospitalizations top 80. Vermont hospitals say they are already stressed. Administrators say unvaccinated coronavirus patients put an avoidable strain on the system. As of Wednesday, Vermont had just 11 open ICU beds across 14 acute care hospitals. “The challenges are becoming greater as we see unvaccinated COVID patients coming into our ICUs, because instead of staying three or four days, they’re staying 21 days,” said Dr. Gil Allen, chief of critical care at the UVM Medical Center. In sum, as of early November 2021, it was true that a very high percentage of Vermont residents were at least partially vaccinated. It was also true that the state had one of the highest daily case counts per capita at the time. However, this data was used in an attempt to prop up a false claim that the 7-day case average was up 16,700% over the previous four months. Not only was this not true, but some of the figures in the chart were not the same as what was shown on the Times' website as of Nov. 11. For these reasons, we have rated the claim as "False."
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • English
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 5 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software