About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/45ea51b8d473809761cf1cef9f1831f41f606570cf7e6c79fc395b53     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • Political partisans often rush to social media in the wake of a mass shooting with unfounded claims, memes, and half-baked theories attempting to show how the "other side" was responsible for the violence. In June 2019, after a 40-year-old man shot and killed a dozen people in a municipal building in Virginia Beach, Va., a pair of rumors concerning his political affiliations were circulated on social media. The first rumor held that DeWayne Craddock was a "black Muslim", a claim we covered here. The other rumor, which we'll examine below, maintained that he was a supporter of U.S. President Donald Trump, wore a "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) hat, and had a "2020 Trump" bumper sticker on his car: We found no basis for this claim, and the Facebook user who spread this rumor provided no news reports or any other documentation to support the assertion. When pressed in the comments to provide a source, the user responded with a mocking message imitating Trump's speech pattern: My sources are the best sources. I have the best people and the best sources. I am never wrong and I never lie. Anybody who disagrees with me is fake news. Believe only me. Only I can save you. You have no hope without me. I am your savior. I am a stable genius. Many people say I am a genius. Many fine people tell me that. . As of this writing, little is known about what motivated the Virginia Beach shooter. He didn't appear to have any social media presence, and he also didn't post any sort of manifesto online explaining his reasons for the attack. Police Chief James Cervera told USA Today that "police don't have a motive at this point for the attack." Law enforcement have not indicated that Craddock's politics, or his religion for that matter, played a role in the shooting: Just why Craddock opened fire at the city’s Department of Public Utilities Building 2, part of a sprawling municipal complex, where he held a mid-level engineering job for 15 years, remained a mystery a day after the massacre. He had not been fired, as some early reports had claimed; he left no explanatory note or online manifesto. In fact, he apparently shunned social media. He had no criminal record, other than a few traffic violations — and both the firearms he used Friday were legally obtained, officials said. It’s no wonder that City Manager Dave Hansen called the deadly rampage “a senseless, incomprehensible act of violence.”
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • English
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 5 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software