About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/474298e308bd6fbdb60adba16cb6e01380191fcef9efa1ef99b0e645     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • Newchecker.in is an independent fact-checking initiative of NC Media Networks Pvt. Ltd. We welcome our readers to send us claims to fact check. If you believe a story or statement deserves a fact check, or an error has been made with a published fact check Contact Us: checkthis@newschecker.in Fact checks doneFOLLOW US Fact Check Pronouncing it’s final verdict of the Hijab row on March 15, 2022 the Karnataka High Court upheld its interim order from February 10, 2022 disallowing students from wearing the hijab to classrooms, stating that it was not an essential religious pratice in Islam. But contrary to the Karnataka HC verdict, several social media users are claiming that the Bombay HC has permitted students to wear hijab in educational institutions in Bombay. A Facebook page named ‘Gulbarga Live’ claims that the Bombay HC has granted the plea of a Muslim student and allowed her to wear the Hijab while attending classes in a college in Thane, Mumbai. Similar posts are also saying that the alleged Bombay High Court verdict comes as a ‘befitting response’ to the judgement by Karnataka High Court. What started as a few female students being stopped from entering the premises of their educational institutions in Udupi, Karnataka, the controversy over wearing the hijab to classes became a nation-wide debate in the ensuing weeks. Famously now known as the Karnataka Hijab row across the country, the incident has gained a lot of attention from the media and public alike. However, the hijab row has also become the hot bed for misinformation. Over the past few weeks Newschecker has debunked many claims related to the incident. The claims ranged from an alleged burqa clad man being arrested for stone pelting on the police to misleading claims about a college student from Karnataka named Muskaan going viral. All the claims viral around the incident fact checked by Newschecker can be found here. To ascertain whether the claim made by these posts is true or not Newschecker investigated this further by conducting a keyword search for the words “hijab bombay high court” to look for the alleged judgement. This led us to fact checks on the matter done by The Quint, The Logical Indian and factly, to name a few. On scrolling through the search results we also came across a news report published by News 18 titled “Bombay High Court Allows Student to Attend College Wearing Hijab” The said article was published by News 18 on March 15, 2018. The article referred to the verdict pronounced by the Bombay High Court in the case of a writ petition filed in front of it by a student “seeking directions to the college and university to either allow her to attend college wearing the hijab or transfer her to another college where she could practice her religious beliefs without any restriction.”, as per News 18. On tallying the contents of the article by News 18 and the Facebook post by ‘Gulbarga Live’ we found out that the post had used the text from the said article. Further, using the phrase “bombay high court allows student to attend college wearing hijab” we further came across articles by The Indian Express and The Asian Age from 2018 on the same matter. All the articles referred to a student of a homoeopathy college in Mumbai who filed a petition in front of the Bombay High Court. The petition was regarding her appeal regarding her college not allowing her to wear the hijab on college premises. Thus, the articles make it clear that the claims made by users on social media in 2022 are actually referring to a 2018 verdict by the Bombay High Court. The claims made by Facebook users about an alleged recent verdict by the Bombay High Court upholding the right to wear hijab in educational institutions are false. No such verdict has been pronounced by the Bombay HC. These claims are actually referring to a ruling regarding a writ petition by the HC in 2018. Our Sources If you would like us to fact check a claim, give feedback or lodge a complaint, WhatsApp us at 9999499044 or email us at checkthis@newschecker.in. You can also visit the Contact Us page and fill out the form. Tanujit Das February 16, 2024 Vasudha Beri February 14, 2024 Preeksha Malhotra October 19, 2021
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • Hindi
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 5 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software