About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/54be9f1b3cc27e4f12507e8e5fec7f79b7943bb5efb29a474bacafbf

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/54be9f1b3cc27e4f12507e8e5fec7f79b7943bb5efb29a474bacafbf Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	schema:ClaimReview
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating	not verifiable
schema:url	http://fullfact.org/europe/employment-or-immigration-which-matters-more/
schema:text	What was claimed Voters don’t support a version of Brexit that will cost jobs. Our verdict There’s polling evidence going both ways. Voters don’t support a version of Brexit that will cost jobs. There’s polling evidence going both ways. “How many people here voted to take their next door neighbour's job away?” Emily Thornberry MP, 13 October 2016 Assuming that leaving the EU single market would have an effect on jobs, how do people feel about it? The polling evidence is mixed. Certainly more people thought that unemployment would go up than down as a result of leaving the EU—32% compared to 22%—according to polling for Ipsos Mori in April and May 2016. But the sample contained more people leaning towards Remain, and we don’t know how many went on to vote Leave. A poll for ORB just after the referendum showed that the public broke 48% to 37% in favour of staying in the single market over limiting EU immigration (unlikely to be possible in the single market). Similar preferences were recorded in some of the other polls in June and July. But others say the opposite. In a poll this month, YouGov found a clear preference for leaving the single market in order to limit immigration. Polling expert John Curtice suggests this shows that “many voters do not have very firm views about which is the more important objective”. People seem to have different priorities when the question is put a different way., When asked how much of their personal income they would sacrifice to reduce immigration, less than 40% were prepared to pay anything. In all these cases, Leave voters were much more prepared to trade economic benefits for lower immigration than voters generally. Full Fact fights for good, reliable information in the media, online, and in politics.
schema:mentions	John Curtice YouGov Ipsos European Single Market Vote Leave 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum Parliament of the United Kingdom European Union dbpedia:Damian_Mori dbpedia:Object_request_broker Full Fact Emily Thornberry
schema:reviewRating	There’s polling evidence going both ways.
schema:author	full-fact
schema:datePublished	2016-10-14 (xsd:date)
schema:inLanguage	English
schema:itemReviewed	http://data.cimple.eu/claim/a3c6862e1d692510556a15af0c9b0c725168b5def77b40ed4ec1a36c

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 3 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software