About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/6506e8ff140441e0f5db1cc247da0546460d9a05606badb954ec737e

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/6506e8ff140441e0f5db1cc247da0546460d9a05606badb954ec737e Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	schema:ClaimReview
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating	not credible
schema:url	http://checkyourfact.com/2022/09/07/fact-check-robert-kennedy-jr-vaccines/
schema:text	FACT CHECK: Did Robert Kennedy Jr. Win A Supreme Court Case Declaring COVID-19 Vaccines Were Not Vaccines? A post shared on Facebook claims anti-vaccine activist Robert Kennedy Jr. was part of a Supreme Court (SCOTUS) case that declared COVID-19 vaccines were “not vaccines.” Verdict: False There is no evidence that Kennedy Jr. was part of such a case on the vaccine. Fact Check: Kennedy Jr. is a well-known anti-vaccine activist who has campaigned against COVID-19 vaccines, according to The New York Times. His non-profit, the Children’s Health Defense, was removed from Instagram and Facebook in August for spreading medical misinformation after originally being suspended for 30 days, the outlet reported. The Facebook post claims Kennedy Jr. was part of a winning coalition in a case regarding the COVID-19 vaccine presented to SCOTUS. “In the ruling, the Supreme Court confirms that the damage caused by Covid mRNA gene therapies is irreparable,” the Facebook post reads in part, adding that “Covid vaccines are not vaccines.” The claim is baseless. A search through the Supreme Court’s recent opinions showed no case regarding the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine or about its contents. Check Your Fact also looked through the Supreme Court’s docket and found no cases regarding the vaccine’s status. There are no credible news reports suggesting Kennedy Jr. has won any SCOTUS case or is planning to bring an argument against the COVID-19 vaccine forward. (RELATED: Did Pfizer Create A COVID-19 Vaccine ‘Vaporizer Cartridge’?) SCOTUS did rule against a rule implemented by President Joe Biden’s administration in January that large businesses with over 100 employees must mandate vaccines for all workers or be tested once a week, according to Stanford Law School’s Blog. The rule for healthcare workers at federally funded facilities, however, was upheld, the blog read. Check Your Fact debunked a claim that the Supreme Court canceled universal vaccination last year. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) state that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective.
schema:mentions	Vaporizer (inhalation device) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Anthony Kennedy Gene therapy Vaccine hesitancy The New York Times Instagram Supreme Court of the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Pfizer Facebook Joe Biden President of the United States Stanford Law School Pseudoscience dbpedia:Joe_DiMaggio dbpedia:COVID-19 dbpedia:COVID-19_vaccine dbpedia:30_Days_of_Night dbpedia:MRNA_vaccine
schema:reviewRating	False
schema:author	check-your-fact
schema:datePublished	2022-09-08 (xsd:date)
schema:inLanguage	English
schema:itemReviewed	http://data.cimple.eu/claim/5eee74cfb21a1bc19b731fccecdb131f1d02625c4bcb8e8b2792d697

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 5 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software