About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/6dbf14428df583ed17039e0dd83bf37308614db711a145b185a36107

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/6dbf14428df583ed17039e0dd83bf37308614db711a145b185a36107 Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	schema:ClaimReview
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating	credible
schema:url	http://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hillary-clinton-sponsored-a-bill-to-punish-flag-burning/
schema:text	On 29 November 2016, President-elect Donald Trump tweeted a controversial opinion about the criminality of flag burning, leading to secondary rumors that his former political rival, Hillary Clinton, once supported criminalizing the act of protest. In his tweet, Trump suggested that "no one" should be permitted to burn the flag, adding that offenders ought to be punished with losing their United States citizenship or spending a year in jail. Almost as quickly as the controversy started, other rumors erupted that in 2005, then-Senator Hillary Clinton sponsored a bill making flag burning an offense punishable by one year in prison or a fine of $100,000. That bill (S.1911, The Flag Protection Act of 2005) was co-sponsored by Clinton, and proposed in part: Any person who shall intentionally threaten or intimidate any person or group of persons by burning, or causing to be burned, a flag of the United States shall be fined not more than $100,000, imprisoned for not more than 1 year, or both. The law was not passed (or considered) by Congress. A critical New York Times editorial published on 7 December 2005 provided context for the proposal: The bill attempts to equate flag-burning with cross-burning, which the Supreme Court, in a sensible and carefully considered 2003 decision, said could be prosecuted under certain circumstances as a violation of civil rights law. It's a ridiculous comparison. Burning a cross is a unique act because of its inextricable connection to the Ku Klux Klan and to anti-black violence and intimidation. A black American who wakes up to see a cross burning on the front lawn has every right to feel personally, and physically, threatened. Flag-burning has no such history. It has, in fact, no history of being directed against any target but the government. As the editorial went on to explain, Clinton's justification for sponsoring the bill was the notion that flag burning could be used to intimidate or threaten American citizens. While the bill was never passed, Trump echoed its proposed $100,000 fine (although "loss of citizenship" was not included in the 2005 legislation).
schema:mentions	Cross burning Citizenship of the United States Federal government of the United States Flag desecration Civil and political rights Ku Klux Klan Supreme Court of the United States United States Congress New York City Hillary Clinton Donald Trump dbpedia:Flag_Protection_Act
schema:reviewRating	True
schema:author	snopescom
schema:datePublished	2016-11-30 (xsd:date)
schema:inLanguage	English
schema:itemReviewed	http://data.cimple.eu/claim/5eae21e10354d423ddcf61f5cbb7e39724e2711e487a606b808dc053

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 5 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software