About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/753dcabe872995ee1d9a1f5c11b153ac39728092c1352f644a3c4d83     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • What was claimed A photo shared in social media posts shows a dog that has been found by a member of the public. Our verdict These posts are hoaxes. The photograph has appeared in online blogs for years. A photo shared in social media posts shows a dog that has been found by a member of the public. These posts are hoaxes. The photograph has appeared in online blogs for years. Multiple Facebook posts have used the same photograph of a dog that they each claim has been found in their local area. But the posts are hoaxes. The posts appeared in local community groups across the UK on 25 May. One of the posts, in a group called “Dagenham and Surrounding Areas Bargains”, has been shared almost 250 times. It says: “Hello, I haven't found the owner of this sweet pup we picked up on the road in #dagenham. She's really depressed and she's not eating. We took her to the vet she's not chipped. Please bump this post to help me find the owner [sic].” Almost identical posts in similar groups claim that the dog in the photo has been found in Blackpool and Stoke-on-Trent. A reverse image search shows that the photo has been used in multiple online blogs about dog care, with one one dating back to 2018. While Full Fact has been unable to confirm the original source of the photo, it is not true that the image has been taken recently by a member of the public who found a dog, as the posts claim. The text in these posts is very similar to hoax posts we’ve written about before. They often use the word “sweet”, say the animal was picked up on a road and is not microchipped and ask the public to “bump” the post. We’ve also seen similar phrasing for hoax posts about missing children, injured pets and abandoned babies. Another clue that a post may not be genuine is that the comments section is disabled to prevent people from being able to alert others that it is a hoax. These posts are sometimes edited later to promote freebies, cashback or property listings. This behaviour can mean that genuine posts could be ignored or dismissed as false. We have written to Meta expressing these concerns and asking the company to take stronger action in response to this problem. It’s always worth checking whether content is real before you share it. We have written a guide on how to verify viral images which you can read here. Image courtesy of Book Catalog This article is part of our work fact checking potentially false pictures, videos and stories on Facebook. You can read more about this—and find out how to report Facebook content—here. For the purposes of that scheme, we’ve rated this claim as false because the posts use a photograph that has been used in online blogs for years and they have almost identical formats to other hoax posts we’ve written about before. Full Fact fights for good, reliable information in the media, online, and in politics.
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • English
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 5 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software