About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/75838409734e747a781809e4860fcfebc1e6a7c9f6c3e6002123e7e8     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • WHAT WAS CLAIMED US Congress will vote on a bill to criminalise the questioning of events surrounding 9/11. OUR VERDICT False. The proposed bill does not exist. A supposed tabloid article has revealed the US Congress will vote on legislation to criminalise questioning of the September 11 terrorist attacks. This is false. There's no such bill on the Congress database and the newspaper article is a spoof. Social media posts making the claim state: "With strong support from AIPAC [American Israel Public Affairs Committee] and the ADL [Anti-Defamation League], Congress is set to vote on a bill that would criminalize questioning the events that took place during the September 11th attacks. "This bill calls for fines up to $10,000 and 5 years imprisonment of anyone who questions, denies, or challenges the official narrative." A search for legislation relating to 9/11 on the Congress database reveals several active bills that are connected to the events of that day, but none of the kind claimed in the posts. The posts appear to show a story from the New York Post (NYP). They don't show the newspaper's masthead, but they provide the source of the screenshot – an X (formerly Twitter) account. This account posted the claim and the same purported news article on April 27, but included the NYP masthead. A search of the paper's website reveals no such story. However, a search for the journalists in the byline reveals a completely different article about disgraced former film producer Harvey Weinstein, with the same authors in the same order and the same time stamp ("Published April 26, 2024, 9:25 p.m. ET"). This suggests a false headline and body text has been placed over a genuine NYP story. Further clues to the "story's" authenticity include the use of all capital letters for the headline (the NYP uses sentence case) and the fact that both the headline and the story text is centred (rather than left-justified). A spokesperson for the paper told Associated Press that no such article was published. Both the AIPAC and the ADL said the purported legislation is fake and they have no involvement in it. Reuters, Verify and AFP have also debunked this claim. The Verdict The claim that the US Congress will vote on a bill to criminalise the questioning of 9/11 events is false. A search of the US Congress database turns up no such bill, and the purported source – the New York Post – has no such story on its website. False — The claim is inaccurate AAP FactCheck is an accredited member of the International Fact-Checking Network. To keep up with our latest fact checks, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • English
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 3 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software