About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/772893bece62c779a183488a84c1eb271de98a49c2c17fc52e1a95a3     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • On March 18, 2024, an account on X, formerly Twitter, uploaded an image of a fish and chip shop owner in London, U.K., standing in front of a mural painted on a wall next to his Golden Chippy store. The mural contained a painting of a humanoid fish holding a Union Flag (archived here). Text added beneath the photo claimed the local council ordered the businessman to remove the mural after receiving complaints that the British flag caused offense. It read: "AWARD WINNING FISH AND CHIP SHOP ORDERED TO TAKE DOWN UNION FLAG AFTER COMPLAINTS TO COUNCIL IT'S OFFENSIVE." Snopes readers asked us to explore the veracity of the claim, which could be seen in similar posts elsewhere on X. Some news outlets also reported on the story. Although the local authority reportedly told The Telegraph the mural was being investigated "following a number of complaints" made to councilors, the council issued a statement two days later, on March 18, 2024, saying the decision to order the mural's removal was completely unrelated to the use of the flag. Royal Borough of Greenwich spokesperson: "You may have seen several headlines over the weekend about a business in Greenwich. "Whilst it's not always appropriate to comment on individual cases, contrary to reports this has nothing to do with the Union Flag or any of the painting's contents. "The advert has been painted, without any permission, in a conservation area, close to a World Heritage Site. The Council is acting according to Government planning laws, as it would with any unauthorised advert. "Any suggestions this is because of the Union Flag are disingenuous and untrue. The business owner is welcome to apply for advert consent in line with the conservation area he is in." The council spokesperson referred to the mural as an advertisement for the award-winning business and said it was painted without permission in a conservation area near a World Heritage Site. Claims that the mural needed removing because it depicted the Union Flag were "disingenuous and untrue," and any other unauthorized advertisement in the area would be treated the same, the spokesperson added. Although the council's statement said the removal order was unrelated to the mural containing the Union Flag, Snopes has not been able to confirm the nature of the complaints and therefore has rated the claim as "Unproven." Snopes has approached Greenwich London Borough Council for comment and will update this article if it receives a response.
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • English
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 5 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software