About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/8c902009d7d1b4cb98067b86037aebd86cb9a48299844084bfc4614b

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/8c902009d7d1b4cb98067b86037aebd86cb9a48299844084bfc4614b Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	schema:ClaimReview
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating	not verifiable
schema:url	http://fullfact.org/crime/can-killers-now-avoid-life-prison-guilty-plea/
schema:text	“The worst murderers should be given a chance to escape staying in prison for life by pleading guilty, according to new rules drawn up for judges.” Daily Mail, 11 February 2016 Suggested new guidelines for judges, published today, wouldn’t significantly change the rules on when someone stays in prison for life. They spell out what the law has said since 2005. Sentencing for murder Criminal courts must follow sentencing guidelines unless it is contrary to the interests of justice to do so. The guidelines set out the required approach to sentencing, including relevant mitigating and aggravating factors in order to determine the appropriate sentence. In the case of murder, Parliament sets out a series of starting points based on the seriousness of the offence and the age of the offender. A judge may set a minimum term of imprisonment to be served. But if he or she doesn’t, the prisoner receives a whole life order, meaning they will never be released from prison. If a judge gives a whole life order, then the sentence can’t be reduced by a guilty plea. But judges must factor a guilty plea into their decision about whether or not there should be a whole life order in the first place. New guidelines don’t change the law This has been the position since a case decided so in 2005, so it’s incorrect to say that the new draft guidelines represent a change in the rules. The new draft guidelines replicate the decision of the Court of Appeal in 2005, in which the Lord Chief Justice said: “It [the court] must have regard to the guilty plea before it decides whether or not to order a whole life term. Having done so it is open to the court to decide that it is nonetheless appropriate to order a whole life term, but must then explain why the guilty plea has not affected the sentence.” The situation is different if the court decides not to give a whole life order. In these circumstances a guilty plea can reduce a sentence by a maximum of 1/6th but never more than five years. The reason for the confusion is that guidelines produced in 2007 merely imply that guilty pleas should be factored into a decision about whether a whole life sentence is justified. Suggested new guidelines now make that point explicit.
schema:mentions	Conscription in the United States Daily Mail Court Life imprisonment in England and Wales United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales Parliament of Singapore
schema:reviewRating	The new sentencing guidelines don’t change the law. If a whole life order is made in court, a guilty plea will not reduce the sentence. However, a judge will factor a guilty plea into the decision about whether to make a whole life order in the first place.
schema:author	full-fact
schema:datePublished	2016-02-11 (xsd:date)
schema:inLanguage	English
schema:itemReviewed	http://data.cimple.eu/claim/cc579e0b3301e92cd199877fe08be50ea32523a78d36c17d65a37e48

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 3 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software