About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/99d132b959529e7de40e7a26fe12500e45c65c81a6b9ad0248019f0d     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • What was claimed A poll shows that UKIP’s Paul Nuttall is set to win in the Stoke Central by-election. Our verdict We don’t know if this was a reliable poll. The information we need to assess the poll hasn’t been published. A poll shows that UKIP’s Paul Nuttall is set to win in the Stoke Central by-election. We don’t know if this was a reliable poll. The information we need to assess the poll hasn’t been published. Honesty in public debate matters You can help us take action – and get our regular free email “UKIP BOOST: Paul Nuttall set for STORMING victory in Stoke by-election, poll reveals” Daily Express, 3 February 2017 This poll received some attention when it was published. As far as we're aware Leave.EU, the campaign group who carried it out, still haven’t published the information you’d need to say whether or not it’s reliable. We’re waiting to hear back from them. The Daily Express said this in its report: “Leave.EU – which is funded by UKIP donor Arron Banks – did not provide details of the poll methodology. But it insisted it was a "major polling exercise" and said the sample size was greater than 4,000.” A sample size of more than 4,000 people would be relatively large by the standards of many constituency polls, which commonly interview around 500 or 1000 people. And Leave.EU has said: “Our polling method consists of a high volume randomised sample and the use of sophisticated AI social media techniques developed in the United States by renowned public affairs firm Goddard Gunster”. But without knowing things like exactly how the question was pitched, how the poll was carried out, and whether the responses were weighted to make the results representative of the constituency as a whole, we don’t have the information we need to judge for ourselves whether the results are reliable. We’ve contacted Leave.EU to ask for the things which the British Polling Council, an association of polling organisations, expects its members to publish alongside their results: We also asked for the complete wording of the question, and whether there was a web address where full results could be viewed. If Leave. EU are able to provide us with this information, we’ll be able to judge the reliability of the poll better. Until then, it’s not possible to say. Full Fact fights for good, reliable information in the media, online, and in politics.
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • English
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 5 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software