About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/9a9cb0a2860bddc7cc207ad42ef98588d1d911d705913b3d6a1d5644     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • WHAT WAS CLAIMED Access will be denied to sporting venues such as the MCG, SCG and Allianz Stadium if the Indigenous voice is enshrined in the constitution. OUR VERDICT False. The voice would be an advisory body with no power to make decisions or veto laws. Non-Indigenous Australians will be banned from sporting venues including the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG) and Sydney Cricket Ground (SCG) if the voice is enshrined in the constitution, it's been claimed. This is false. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice would be an advisory body to federal parliament with no power to make decisions or veto laws. The claim was made in a Facebook post (archived here) earlier this year. The post claims that if the voice referendum is successful "we will be denied access to many areas our taxes paid to improve, sporting facilities, MCG, SCG, Allianz Stadium, Rugby League stadiums…" It goes on to also name "the tennis centre", Mount Macedon, bushwalking areas and beaches. "They will want to close it to demand more money from us to access those areas," the post adds. The proposal to enshrine an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander voice into the Australian Constitution will go to a referendum later this year. As explained in previous AAP FactCheck debunks, the proposed constitutional amendment makes clear the voice would be an advisory body, able to make recommendations on matters affecting Indigenous peoples. It would have no power to make decisions and cannot veto legislation. Legal experts told AAP FactCheck that the parliament and executive are not even required to consider what the voice has to say. The origin of the sporting facilities claim is unclear. However, previous checks have looked at claims relating to native title misinformation such as this debunk. Experts told AAP FactCheck that private property is protected from native title claims. The post makes a number of other false claims, including in the photo caption, which states: "Grampians only for Aborigines. Australians are not allowed there." This claim is in relation to a review of a number of rock climbing sites in the Victorian national park. Many sites were closed off to protect Indigenous heritage, although some were later reopened. But it is false to say the Grampians is only open for Aboriginal people. The park is open to all and the restrictions relating to rock climbing sites apply to everyone equally. The Verdict The claim that access will be denied to sporting venues such as the MCG, SCG and Allianz Stadium if the proposed Indigenous voice is enshrined in the constitution is false. If this year's referendum is successful, the voice to parliament will be an advisory body with no power to make decisions or veto legislation. False – The claim is inaccurate. AAP FactCheck is an accredited member of the International Fact-Checking Network. To keep up with our latest fact checks, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • English
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 5 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software