About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/b10a50d3119d4b9cd40f5830a1c79ba659097e2688a732718cc4165a     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • “Soaring suicide rates among young people is slowing down national life expectancy… “There were 6,507 suicides registered by coroners in 2018 - a rise of 11.8% on the previous year.” The Telegraph, 25 September 2019 Last week the Telegraph reported on “soaring” suicide rates among young people in the UK based on data from 2018. The article says: “There were 6,507 suicides registered by coroners in 2018 - a rise of 11.8% on the previous year.” While this is technically correct, some of this rise may actually be due to changes in how suicide is defined. In England and Wales, when someone dies unexpectedly, a coroner investigates their cause of death. Until recently, to record a case of suicide, coroners had to prove the deceased intended to kill themselves to a criminal legal standard—beyond all reasonable doubt. But in July 2018 the standard of proof was lowered to a civil legal standard—on the balance of probabilities. It’s unlikely that this change will account for the whole rise, however. Official statistics on suicide already incorporated both suicides where the judgement was that the deceased intended to take their own life AND cases where the intent was recorded as “undetermined.” So, in theory, changes to the number of cases coroners will now record as suicide as opposed to cases with undetermined intent are unlikely to make much difference to the statistics on suicide. In Scotland—where there was no change to the definition—there was also a significant rise in suicides in 2018. Nevertheless, The Office for National Statistics says: “It is likely that lowering the standard of proof will result in an increased number of deaths recorded as suicide, possibly creating a discontinuity in our time series.” In other words, you might not be comparing like-for-like when you compare last year’s figures to those in previous years. The Telegraph article does not mention this at any point, although it does link to another article on the change to recording practice. The Samaritans’ media guidelines clearly state that, in reporting on suicide, journalists should aim for “sensitive, nonsensationalising coverage”. It adds: “Use statistics with caution. Check with Samaritans or the relevant national statistical agency to make sure you have the most recent data and are comparing like with like.” Honesty in public debate matters You can help us take action – and get our regular free email The Samaritans’ helpline is available at all hours and can be contacted free on 116 123, or you can email jo@samaritans.org
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • English
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 11 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software