About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/c6e052cf75c4e1f54dfa9a80cc28615a7bb7c155c9043aa0d6ca7360

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/c6e052cf75c4e1f54dfa9a80cc28615a7bb7c155c9043aa0d6ca7360 Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	schema:ClaimReview
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating	not verifiable
schema:url	http://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ohio-bull-shark/
schema:text	Origin On July 6, 2015, a photograph purportedly showing a bull shark caught in the Ohio River near Indiana began circulating online. Although the photograph was real, the background story commonly associated with it is false: The bull shark pictured above was caught by fisherman Terry Hessey not in the Ohio River, but a world away at the mouth of the Brisbane River in Australia. The shark, which Hessey claimed in 2008 during the Brisbane River Classic fishing competition, was measured at 2.9 meters and was estimated as weighing between 250kg and 300kg (the only available scale had a capacity of 200kg). While the Brisbane River Classic does include a "longest shark" award, Hessey's catch stirred up controversy: Brisbane River Classic fishing competitor Terry Hessey caught the 2.9m bull shark at the mouth of the river in December [2008] and pictures posted on the internet have since fired up debate. The species, which lurks on the city's doorstep, has been implicated in attacks on swimmers in canals and waterways and was thought to have killed a woman swimming at Amity on North Stradbroke island in 2006. Mr Hessey did not want to comment on the issue but fishing competition organiser Angus Gorrie said the angler usually released fish unharmed. "Inevitably, there are some fatalities but about four in five sharks are released," he said. Mr Gorrie said he understood there was a trophy element to Mr Hessey's kill but most smaller bull sharks were taken for eating just as people ate bream or whiting. His competition would in future cater for photographic entries so animals did not have to be killed and weighed. Numerous photographs and videos circulate on the Internet. Some are real. Some are fake. Some are real, but have been given false backstories. Here are a few of our favorites from the Snopes fauxtography archives:
schema:mentions	dbpedia:Aberdeen_Angus dbpedia:Howick,_Ontario Ohio River Angling Bull shark Swimming Snopes Species Indiana Fish Internet City Australia Bream dbpedia:Brisbane_River dbpedia:North_Stradbroke_Island dbpedia:Brisbane_River_Classic dbpedia:Photograph_manipulation
schema:reviewRating	Miscaptioned
schema:author	snopescom
schema:datePublished	2015-07-07 (xsd:date)
schema:inLanguage	English
schema:itemReviewed	http://data.cimple.eu/claim/2b7b0eb4b3130c4dfce5187ba0a0376c93423ec939b1b37f8d1e1369

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 3 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software