About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/d1ef6774b45e02f29a2e90ba397492731e97556c5991471e58b99171     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • This article has been updated "Cannabis causing a quarter of psychosis"—Daily Telegraph front page, Monday 16 February 2015 This claim also appeared in the Daily Mail and the Mirror yesterday. But it's not true. Researchers studied people who had psychotic disorders in South London, and found that 24% of these cases were linked to use of a more potent type of cannabis (often called 'skunk'). But the use of skunk, and consequently psychotic disorders, is more common in South London than elsewhere in the UK. So the figure isn't representative of the rest of the UK, as the researchers pointed out in their paper. While this was made clearer in the body of the Telegraph and Mirror articles, that doesn't justify the misleading headlines. We're asking for these to be corrected. Why population matters—an example Imagine a study that looks at broken legs in an alpine town. Half the people in the town ski regularly, and the other don't. For the sake of argument let's say people who ski are far more likely to break a leg or two. So much so that 90% of broken legs in our fictional town are a result of skiing accidents. The study would tell you a lot about the relative riskiness of skiing in the alps compared to not doing so, and could make interesting reading for anyone who's considering a holiday to that particular resort. But it'd be ludicrous to suggest that 90% of all broken legs are a result of skiing accidents. That figure is specific to the people under study because the way they behave (particularly their skiing habits) isn't typical. That's what we're doing when we take the proportion of cases in South London that are cannabis-related and apply it to everyone in the UK. The research found that smoking skunk—but not hash—is associated with an increased risk of psychosis The research found that compared to people who'd never used cannabis, skunk users were at three times the risk of developing a psychotic disorder. If they smoked it every day they were at five times the risk. Users of hash, a less potent form of cannabis, were found to be at no higher risk of psychotic disorders than non-users, irrespective of how often they smoked it. Update 26/02/2015 Part of this article originally said the research found skunk use increased the risk of psychosis, when in fact it was found to be associated with an increased risk of psychosis. Featured image courtesy of Duncan C.
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • English
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 2 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software