About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/dcb86440e4708059f2e852c8aa9c70ccfb064b3346a03bcbdbc71686

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/dcb86440e4708059f2e852c8aa9c70ccfb064b3346a03bcbdbc71686 Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	schema:ClaimReview
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating	not credible
schema:url	http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/fact-check/supreme-court-did-not-junk-entire-marcos-electoral-protest-vs-robredo/
schema:text	SUMMARY This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article. At a glance: - Claim: The Supreme Court, sitting as the Presidential Electoral Tribunal, did not junk the entire electoral protest filed by former senator Bongbong Marcos against Vice President Leni Robredo. - Rating: FALSE - The facts: Contrary to the claim, the SC categorically announced that it has “unanimously dismissed” the “entire electoral protest.” - Why we fact-checked this: As of writing, the post containing the video of this claim has 109,000 views and around 9,700 reactions. The post was shared by several other pro-Marcos groups on Facebook. The claim was also used in a partisan YouTube video, which currently has over 50,000 views. Complete details Former Biliran representative and lawyer Glenn Chong posted a video of him on Facebook on Tuesday, February 16, echoing the wrong claim of Marcos’ lawyer, Vic Rodriguez, that the High Court only partially rejected the electoral protest filed by Marcos against Robredo. Chong’s video had the caption: “PAGLINAW SA PAGBASURA DIUMANO NG PROTESTA NI BBM… Mainstream media, fake news talaga!” (Clarification on the alleged junking of BBM’s protest… Mainstream media, fake news!) As of writing, Chong’s video has 3,800 shares, 109,000 views, and 9,700 reactions. The post was also found in one of the pro-Marcos Facebook pages. The claim was also used in a partisan YouTube video posted by a questionable channel. The claim alleged that the SC has yet to act on the third cause of action, and only supposedly rejected the second one in its February 16 decision. This claim is false. Following the Marcos camp’s claims, the SC Public Information Office (PIO) clearly said that the “entire electoral protest” has been dismissed unanimously. The decision put to rest the electoral protest that had plagued the vice presidency for almost 5 years. Rappler has published other fact check stories on false claims about the electoral protest and Marcos’ supposed victory. – Camille Elemia/Rappler.com Add a comment How does this make you feel? There are no comments yet. Add your comment to start the conversation.
schema:mentions	Presidential Electoral Tribunal dbpedia:Numeris dbpedia:Biliran Rappler Supreme Court of the Philippines Supreme Court of India Fake news YouTube Vice President of the Philippines Bongbong Marcos Artificial intelligence Leni Robredo Facebook dbpedia:Vic_Rodriguez dbpedia:Case_citation dbpedia:Glenn_Chong dbpedia:High_Court_of_Singapore
schema:reviewRating	False
schema:author	rappler
schema:datePublished	2021-02-18 (xsd:date)
schema:inLanguage	Filipino
schema:itemReviewed	http://data.cimple.eu/claim/5b7c94e0a515dbd47a51ced37dc9c3d351f4b9e2f1912ef7fa24d1d5

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 2 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software