About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/e1d46bb7ff7ea1e042587116f35cecc1d3db16161eb67e319fc30e2f

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/e1d46bb7ff7ea1e042587116f35cecc1d3db16161eb67e319fc30e2f Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	schema:ClaimReview
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating	not verifiable
schema:url	http://fullfact.org/health/infection-illness-children-coronavirus/
schema:text	“Children and adults have same chance of getting ill.” The Times front page, 15 May 2020 Today the Times’ front page carried a story with a headline claiming that children and adults have the same chance of getting ill from Covid-19, based on new figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). But that is not what the ONS said. It actually said: “There is no evidence of differences in the proportions testing positive for COVID-19 between the age categories.” Being infected with Covid-19 and becoming ill with the disease are two different things. Just because children appear to be as likely to be infected as adults, that doesn’t mean they are as likely to become ill, because being infected doesn’t automatically mean you display symptoms or become ill. There’s good reason to believe that children have a better chance of avoiding illness after being infected with Covid-19 than adults. Even if the Times had just said children had the same chance of becoming infected as adults, this would still be on shaky ground, as the evidence the ONS has gathered on this is far from conclusive. The Times’ online edition didn’t carry this headline. Honesty in public debate matters You can help us take action – and get our regular free email What did the ONS find? The ONS took swab samples from around 11,000 people across England in private households (excluding hospitals care homes or other institutional settings). It found there was no evidence that the proportion of people testing positive for Covid-19 varied by age category, though the margin of error for each group was significant. These age categories were 2 to 19, 20 to 49, 50 to 69 and 70 years and over. So while there was no evidence in the results of this survey that prevalence varies by age, that doesn’t mean we can say for sure that there is no difference in the prevalence of coronavirus infection by age. Infection isn’t the same as illness We already know that children exhibit milder symptoms from Covid-19 infection than adults. We also know that some Covid-19 infections are asymptomatic, though we don’t know exactly how many. But that means we can say with reasonable certainty that relatively fewer children than adults will become “ill”, even if the infection rates are identical.
schema:mentions	Office for National Statistics The Times Asymptomatic England Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Shaky Ground dbpedia:COVID-19
schema:reviewRating	The ONS found, with a degree of uncertainty, that there was no evidence that the rate of infection differed by age group, but being infected doesn’t necessarily mean you become ill and display symptoms.
schema:author	full-fact
schema:datePublished	2020-05-15 (xsd:date)
schema:inLanguage	English
schema:itemReviewed	http://data.cimple.eu/claim/8c1ac8a01e2426e629ebc6d926897270ba1cce848e1737a19f1a12b3

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 3 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software