About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/e3154f2776392dd1f68ecd2a03dac21be8502837bbf6fc4543c7e093     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • Fact Check: Viral message claiming Muslims admitted in the court that process of ‘halal’ involved spitting on the food is FALSE Allegation of Muslim community admitting that spitting is part of the halal process is FALSE Claim :Muslim community admits in the court that spitting on food is part of halal process Fact :Allegation of Muslim community admitting that spitting is part of the halal process is FALSE A text message claiming that during a court hearing in Tamil Nadu, Muslim groups admitted that the process of ‘halal’ was complete only if it was spat on, is being widely shared on WhatsApp. The text claims that Muslims follow this practice for religious reasons and further advocates against 'ordering food from any Muslim-owned hotel'. A portion of the text reads: "In a court case in Tamil Nadu, Muslims held that the meaning of Halal is not complete until the cook does not spit in it. Therefore food prepared by Muslims is not complete without spitting. In a court case, they admitted that spitting is what made Halal complete, throughout the Nation including TN [sic]." FACT CHECK: The case referred to in the viral message took place in 2021. However, the case came up for hearing in the Kerala High Court and not the Tamil Nadu court. A plea was filed by SJR Kumar, general convener of the Sabarimala Action Committee, who alleged that Travancore Devaswom Board (TDB) which manages the Sabarimala temple, had been using spoiled halal-certified jaggery to prepare Naivedyam and Prasadam Travancore Devaswom Board is an autonomous body formed under the Hindu Religious Institutions Act XV of 1950. The board administers 1,248 temples in Kerala which also includes the Sabarimala Temple. This petitioner states the “use of Halal-certified food materials, which is specifically prepared as per the religious beliefs of another community, is not a Satwik/pure material to be offered to Lord Ayyappa.” However, as per an article in The News Minute, the High Court bench told the petitioner that “The concept of halal only says that certain things are prohibited. All other things are ‘halal’. This certification only says that those prohibited materials are not included in a particular product.” To clarify, Halal is Arabic for permissible. Halal food is that which adheres to Islamic law. With reference to food, it is the dietary standard as prescribed in the Quran. Halal food is any food deemed permissible under Islamic law, as defined in the Quran. It is noteworthy to mention that over the course of proceedings of the case, no Muslim organization or Muslim individual was referred to, contrary to the claim of Muslims admitting that the process of ‘halal’ was complete only if it was spat on. Hence, it is clear that the Muslim community did not admit in the court that spitting on food is part of halal.
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • Telugu
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 2 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software