About: http://data.cimple.eu/news-article/4e0848a98db98ab9b7de95098342ad2e8a33931755bf8bf3a874246d     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:NewsArticle, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
schema:articleBody
  • Pharmaceutical companies making Covid vaccines are largely protected legally in the event of harmful side effects, like blood clots that have been linked to jabs from AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson. However while some governments will pay compensation due to sufferers, others assume it is the responsibility of the companies even after drugs agencies back the vaccines. Europe's drug regulator was set Tuesday to rule on the safety of the J&J single-shot vaccine after fears it could cause extremely rare clots, while the US will likely announce its verdict on the jab by Friday. The European Medicines Agency has reviewed four cases -- one fatal -- of rare blood clots reported among people who got the shot. The J&J vaccine concerns follow similar reports of blood clots in a very small number of people who received the AstraZeneca jab. Outlined below are some of the geographical similarities and differences regarding potential legal fallout: The United States and the UK have limited the legal responsibility of pharma groups, in a move seen as helping to speed up production of vaccines. In the US, the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act authorises the health secretary "to limit legal liability for losses relating to the administration of medical countermeasures such as diagnostics, treatments, and vaccines". This is "to encourage the expeditious development and deployment of medical countermeasures during a public health emergency", the PREP Act adds. The act also limits the individual liability of pharmaceutical executives, except "for death or serious physical injury caused by 'willful misconduct'" -- which can be difficult to prove according to lawyers. In Canada, the government is creating a national compensation scheme for any medical fallout from Covid-19 vaccines. Britain's government has removed a potentially heavy financial burden for drugs companies by applying its existing compensation programme for illnesses such as tuberculosis and measles also to the coronavirus. Under the British scheme, a Vaccine Damage Payment in the event of severe disability rise to £120,000 ($165,000, 139,000 euros). In the European Union, the situation differs in that legal responsibility lies with the companies. "However, in certain, very specific circumstances, the companies may ask the member states to indemnify," according to Stefan de Keersmaeker, a spokesman for the European Commission. Any disagreement is resolved in court, he added. According to Antonio Andrade, a lawyer for Portuguese firm Abreu, a vaccine-maker cannot be held responsible for any possible "side effects" flagged up, for example in a leaflet. The EMA has already stated that the AstraZeneca vaccine could cause very rare blood clots in some recipients, causing some countries to stop giving it to people under a certain age. bur-ved/bcp/rfj/lc
schema:headline
  • Covid vaccine-makers largely protected on side effects
schema:mentions
schema:author
schema:datePublished
http://data.cimple...sPoliticalLeaning
http://data.cimple...logy#hasSentiment
http://data.cimple...readability_score
http://data.cimple...entionsConspiracy
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 3 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software