About: http://data.cimple.eu/news-article/ba42560e5d2510f4b77dc50edbd8afc789f92c7d6ed0cd11857aa3c4     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:NewsArticle, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
schema:articleBody
  • Norway's Supreme Court began examining Wednesday a case brought by two environmental groups seeking the cancellation of oil licenses granted by the Norwegian state in the Arctic. The case is being watched closely in a country that owes its vast wealth to its abundant oil and gas reserves, as it could impact its future oil production. Greenpeace and Natur og Ungdom have already had their complaint dismissed by two lower courts, and have appealed to Norway's highest court to cancel the Barents Sea exploration licenses granted to 13 oil companies in 2016. They argue the concessions violate the Norwegian constitution, which since 2014 guarantees the right to a healthy environment. They also say that new oil activities in the region would be contrary to the 2015 Paris climate accord, which seeks to limit average global warming to under two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit). "Opening up the Arctic for oil drilling in the time of climate emergency is unacceptable, and the Norwegian government must be held accountable," the head of Greenpeace Norway, Frode Pleym, said in a statement. A legal victory for the two NGOs "could outlaw new oil drilling in the Arctic and set a precedent for similar climate cases all over the world." Symbolically, they placed a globe carved out of ice in front of the Supreme Court building before the hearing began Wednesday -- by video link, due to corona restrictions -- which coincided with the formal exit of the United States from the Paris accord. The Norwegian state has meanwhile argued that Article 112 of the constitution is not "a ban on ... activities that could have negative consequences for the environment or the climate", but rather "an obligation for authorities to take measures to remedy any negative effects." Despite their previous legal setbacks, the plaintiffs did win some important points in the Appeals Court ruling. Among other things, the court ruled that CO2 emissions from Norwegian oil ought to be calculated in their totality -- in other words, not just during the production phase in Norway, but also in the much more polluting phase of consumption outside Norway. Western Europe's biggest oil and gas producer, Norway owes much of its wealth to oil and gas, enabling it to amass the world's biggest sovereign wealth fund valued at more than $1 trillion. Meanwhile the Barents Sea, at the heart of the legal battle, has so far yielded disappointing results for oil seekers. The Supreme Court will examine the case until November 12, with the verdict expected several weeks later. phy/po/rl
schema:headline
  • Norway court begins review of Arctic oil licenses
schema:mentions
schema:author
schema:datePublished
http://data.cimple...sPoliticalLeaning
http://data.cimple...logy#hasSentiment
http://data.cimple...readability_score
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 3 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software