About: http://data.cimple.eu/news-article/cdb78d06452ee19b933fbbbe8383525cf6be98dd9c225c04957697c8     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:NewsArticle, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
schema:articleBody
  • Just four percent of scientific research published on Covid-19 is relevant to Africa despite the continent containing close to a fifth of humanity, according to an analysis published Tuesday. With nearly four million confirmed cases across the continent, the authors of the study said the relative lack of research on Africa or authored by Africans added to the growing body of "evidence of coloniality in global health research and decision-making". Researchers analysed more than 2,000 peer-reviewed articles published in the 10 leading health and medical journals between January 1 and September 30, 2020. Just 94 out of 2,196 articles studied -- around four percent -- contained content related to Africa or a specific African country, the analysis found. In the articles relevant to Africa, just 210 out of 619 listed authors who were African -- 34 percent. That means that two-thirds of the authors of Covid-19 research related to the continent were non-African, compared with African authors making up three percent of the authors of non-Africa-focused research. Africa is home to 17 percent of the world's population. The authors of the analysis, published in the online journal BMJ Global Health, said the results were not surprising given how African authors have historically been under-represented across scientific research. "Health policy is not only informed by original research; sensible, contextually appropriate guidelines, opinions and commentary are also essential to improving the functioning of healthcare systems," they wrote. "This is especially true during times of surge, when original research can be challenging to produce in low resource settings, like those in Africa. "African voices and research are needed to guide the local pandemic response," they concluded. The authors called for governments to increase research funding, particularly into infectious diseases, and said that scientific journals had a role to play in ensuring their studies are more representative of the global population. "The time has come that authoritative journals need to turn to authors and ask where local representation is on papers describing health systems in regions that are not there own," they wrote. A separate analysis reinforced the findings, looking at research linked to African researchers or institutions between November 2019 and August 2020. It found that African countries produced three percent of the global share of Covid-19 publications during this period. Almost two thirds of these came from just three countries: South Africa, Egypt and Nigeria. pg/mh/dl
schema:headline
  • Just 4% of Covid research relevant to Africa: study
schema:mentions
schema:author
schema:datePublished
http://data.cimple...sPoliticalLeaning
http://data.cimple...logy#hasSentiment
http://data.cimple...readability_score
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 3 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software