About: The question the court was asked to determine was whether the award of the contract was unlawful because of “apparent bias”. The judgment explicitly states that there was no suggestion of actual bias (it was not an issue that the court was asked to address). The court ruled there was apparent bias and therefore the award of the contract was unlawful.     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:Rating, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
schema:name
  • The question the court was asked to determine was whether the award of the contract was unlawful because of “apparent bias”. The judgment explicitly states that there was no suggestion of actual bias (it was not an issue that the court was asked to address). The court ruled there was apparent bias and therefore the award of the contract was unlawful.
schema:sameAs
schema:ratingValue
  • The question the court was asked to determine was whether the award of the contract was unlawful because of “apparent bias”. The judgment explicitly states that there was no suggestion of actual bias (it was not an issue that the court was asked to address). The court ruled there was apparent bias and therefore the award of the contract was unlawful.
schema:author
is schema:reviewRating of
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 11 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software