About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/04e4e3fed0bd8984b3c463db490543fd5aadf69f7c5e3046fecc7885

Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
- owl:sameAs
- Inference Rule:

About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/04e4e3fed0bd8984b3c463db490543fd5aadf69f7c5e3046fecc7885 Goto Sponge NotDistinct Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

Attributes	Values
rdf:type	schema:ClaimReview
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating	not credible
schema:url	http://checkyourfact.com/2022/09/26/fact-check-supreme-court-condoms/
schema:text	FACT CHECK: Did The Supreme Court Ban Condoms? A post shared on Instagram claims the Supreme Court recently issued an opinion that outlawed the use of condoms. View this post on Instagram Verdict: False While the recent Dobbs V. Jackson ruling suggest cases regarding contraception could be heard before the court, no such opinion banning condoms has been issued. Fact Check: The Supreme Court issued an opinion effective overturning Roe V. Wade in June, a long-standing ruling that guaranteed a constitutional right to abortion, according to The New York Times. Since Roe was overturned, several states have either restricted or banned the procedure, the outlet reported. The Instagram post claims that the Supreme Court voted to ban condoms. The post does not state what ruling made this declaration or when it was issued. This claim is baseless. There are no credible news reports stating that the Supreme Court would be hearing any upcoming cases or has issued any rulings regarding contraceptives. Check Your Fact also searched recent Supreme Court opinions and orders and did not find any rulings specifically addressing contraceptives or condoms in general. The Supreme Court’s most recent order relates to Yeshiva University and a LGBT+ club on campus, according to NPR. (RELATED: Did Robert Kennedy Jr. Win A Supreme Court Case Declaring COVID-19 Vaccines Were Not Vaccines?) Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas did write in his concurring opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson that the court should revisit previous decisions such as Griswold v. Connecticut, according to The Texas Tribune. Griswold established a right to contraception, outlawing states from banning use of contraceptives, the outlet reported. Misinformation around the Supreme Court is not new. Earlier this month, Check Your Fact debunked a claim that anti-vaccine activist Robert Kennedy Jr. won a Supreme Court case declaring COVID-19 vaccines were not vaccines.
schema:mentions	Abortion in the United States Andrew Jackson Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Connecticut Clarence Thomas NPR Vaccine hesitancy Birth control The New York Times Instagram LGBT Court Supreme Court of the United States Yeshiva University George Wade The Texas Tribune dbpedia:COVID-19
schema:reviewRating	False
schema:author	check-your-fact
schema:datePublished	2022-09-26 (xsd:date)
schema:inLanguage	English
schema:itemReviewed	http://data.cimple.eu/claim/a4a3c6a4c60c0ee4053492342675ed1b781f17153f7e953e4b4dc156

Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023

Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE Content Formats:

RDF

ODATA

Microdata

About

OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 5 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software