About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/11c924797aa412a751c4d0748aa75668f524f7c0ce44d11a647ffc0e     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • What was claimed The first asylum seeker flight from the UK to Rwanda was stopped by an EU court. Our verdict This is not true. A European Court of Human Rights ruling stopped the flight. It is a totally separate institution from the EU. The first asylum seeker flight from the UK to Rwanda was stopped by an EU court. This is not true. A European Court of Human Rights ruling stopped the flight. It is a totally separate institution from the EU. On Tuesday evening the first flight due to take asylum seekers from the UK to Rwanda was cancelled minutes before it was due to take off, due to an intervention from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). GB News and ITV’s Good Morning Britain programme have said the flight was stopped by an “EU court injunction” or “EU court ruling” in on-screen text, implying that the ECHR is linked to the European Union—which the UK left in 2020. This is incorrect. The ECHR is not an EU institution. Honesty in public debate matters You can help us take action – and get our regular free email The ECHR is part of the Council of Europe, a human rights organisation of which the UK is still a member, alongside 45 other states. All 27 member states of the EU are in the Council of Europe, and its headquarters are in Strasbourg, France. We have written about the distinction between the EU and the ECHR in the past. The EU has its own court system, the Court of Justice of the European Union. It is based in Luxembourg, and interprets EU law to ensure it is applied in the same way in all EU countries. An ITV spokesperson said that Good Morning Britain had explained on multiple occasions during the programme that the ECHR is separate from the EU. They added: “One of today's show guests, Jessica Simor QC also specifically explained the differences to viewers and earlier on-screen captions were correct. “Unfortunately, one of the on-screen captions was incorrect, but the correct description was used and explained to viewers several times elsewhere in the programme Full Fact also contacted GB News for comment but did not receive a response. Image courtesy of Adrian Grycuk - This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Poland license. Update 16 June 2022 This article has been updated to include a comment from ITV. Full Fact fights for good, reliable information in the media, online, and in politics.
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • English
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 2 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software