About: http://data.cimple.eu/claim-review/cc00589f61c418410d065e00bf17825e7e99c9974c2755e26b1530e6     Goto   Sponge   NotDistinct   Permalink

An Entity of Type : schema:ClaimReview, within Data Space : data.cimple.eu associated with source document(s)

AttributesValues
rdf:type
http://data.cimple...lizedReviewRating
schema:url
schema:text
  • “Trump-backed anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine is the most effective coronavirus treatment currently available, finds international poll of 6,000 doctors “Majority of 6,200 doctors from 30 nations said malaria drug was most effective.” MailOnline, 3 April 2020 Last week, online medical forum Sermo published the results of a survey which suggested that doctors believe that the drugs chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are the most effective medications in fighting Covid-19. The use of these drugs to combat Covid-19 has been controversial. While there have been various reports on how effective they are, as we wrote recently, there’s not yet any concrete evidence from peer-reviewed studies that the drugs, which are already used for a number of other conditions, will work against Covid-19. You also shouldn’t use these medications unless you are specifically prescribed them by a doctor. They can be fatal if taken without proper supervision. That aside, this poll by Sermo doesn’t really tell us how many doctors prefer this treatment or how effective it is. The reporting of the poll has also suffered from inaccuracy and overstatement. The first thing to note is that Sermo’s poll is not representative of all doctors so we can’t say whether these drugs really have the backing of the worldwide medical community. Polls, by design, ask a relatively small group of people (the “sample”) what they think, and try to make sure that those people represent the wider population—meaning a survey is only as useful as the people it surveys. Sermo’s methodology shows that the sample it surveyed did not match the profile of doctors worldwide and the data wasn’t weighted afterwards to adjust for that. So all we can say is that these results are the views of the 6,227 doctors who did the survey, not doctors in general. The survey’s limitations aside, the reporting of the results by MailOnline contained inaccuracies. When reporting on the findings, MailOnline reported that the majority of 6,200 doctors said the anti-malarial drug was the most effective. That’s incorrect. Describing it as a majority suggests that more than half of the doctors surveyed answered in this way. While these drugs were favoured more than any other option, it was only 37% of over around 2,000 doctors involved in treatment who considered them to be “most effective”. Also, that doesn’t necessarily mean these doctors considered the drug to be more effective than the other options. Doctors were allowed to choose more than one option when asked what they thought were the most effective treatments. While 37% picked chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine, the majority of these doctors also picked at least one other drug too. Again, whether or not these results are representative, you should only take medication specifically prescribed for you by a doctor.
schema:mentions
schema:reviewRating
schema:author
schema:datePublished
schema:inLanguage
  • English
schema:itemReviewed
Faceted Search & Find service v1.16.115 as of Oct 09 2023


Alternative Linked Data Documents: ODE     Content Formats:   [cxml] [csv]     RDF   [text] [turtle] [ld+json] [rdf+json] [rdf+xml]     ODATA   [atom+xml] [odata+json]     Microdata   [microdata+json] [html]    About   
This material is Open Knowledge   W3C Semantic Web Technology [RDF Data] Valid XHTML + RDFa
OpenLink Virtuoso version 07.20.3238 as of Jul 16 2024, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-musl), Single-Server Edition (126 GB total memory, 5 GB memory in use)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software